4.7 Article

Nucleolar NF-κB/RelA mediates apoptosis by causing cytoplasmic relocalization of nucleophosmin

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 1889-1903

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2011.79

关键词

NPM; B23; aspirin; nucleoli

资金

  1. University of Leeds
  2. Yorkshire cancer Research Award
  3. Cancer Research UK [C20658/A6656]
  4. AICR [10-0158]
  5. Melville Trust for the Cure and Care of Cancer
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G022836/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/G022836/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a number of contexts, and particularly in response to cellular stress, stimulation of the NF-kappaB (NF-kappa B) pathway promotes apoptosis. One mechanism underlying this pro-apoptotic activity is nucleolar sequestration of RelA, which is reported to cause cell death by repressing NF-kappa B-driven transcription. Here, we identify a novel and distinct nucleolar activity of RelA that induces apoptosis. We demonstrate, using a viral nucleolar localization signal (NoLS)-RelA fusion protein, that direct targeting of RelA to the nucleolus mediates apoptosis, independent of NF-kappa B transcriptional activity. We demonstrate a requirement for nucleophosmin (NPM, B23.1) in this apoptotic effect, and the apoptotic effect of stress-induced nucleolar RelA. We show by multiple approaches that nucleolar translocation of RelA is causally involved in the relocalization of NPM from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm and that RelA-induced cytoplasmic NPM mediates apoptosis by facilitating the mitochondrial accumulation of BAX. These data uncover a novel stress-response pathway and mechanism by which RelA promotes apoptosis, independent of its effects on NF-kappa B transcriptional activity. These findings are relevant to the design of novel anticancer agents that target RelA to this compartment. Cell Death and Differentiation (2011) 18, 1889-1903; doi:10.1038/cdd.2011.79; published online 10 June 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据