4.7 Article

zVAD-induced necroptosis in L929 cells depends on autocrine production of TNF alpha mediated by the PKC-MAPKs-AP-1 pathway

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 26-37

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2010.72

关键词

zVAD-fmk; autocrine production of TNF alpha; necroptosis; L929 cells; PKC; AP-1

资金

  1. NUS
  2. NUS University Research Council (URC)
  3. Singapore Biomedical Research Council (BMRC)
  4. Life Science Institute, NUS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is intriguing that some pan-caspase inhibitors such as zVAD-fmk (zVAD) are capable of inducing necrotic cell death in a selected group of cells. As earlier reports from our laboratory have ruled out the original notion that zVAD-induced necrosis in mouse fibrosarcoma L929 cells was autophagic cell death, the main objective of this study was thus to determine the underlying mechanism of this form of cell death. In this study, we provided clear evidence that zVAD-induced necroptosis in L929 cells and such cell death is dependent on autocrine production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) at the transcriptional level. More importantly, we identified that activating protein-1 (AP-1), but not nuclear factor kappa-B, is the transcription factor controlling zVAD-induced TNF alpha transcription. Moreover, zVAD is able to activate AP-1 through activation of two upstream mitogen-activated kinases (MAPKs), c-Jun N-terminal kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Finally, we found that protein kinase C is the important upstream signaling molecule in mediating zVAD-induced activation of MAPKs and AP-1, and subsequent autocrine production of TNF alpha and cell death. Data from this study reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying zVAD-induced necroptosis, an important form of programmed necrotic cell death with increasing understanding of its biological significance in health and diseases. Cell Death and Differentiation (2011) 18, 26-37; doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.72; published online 11 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据