4.7 Article

A combined neural network and decision trees model for prognosis of breast cancer relapse

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 45-63

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0933-3657(02)00086-6

关键词

back-propagation algorithm; Bayes error; survival analysis; breast cancer; decision trees; inductive learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction of clinical outcome of patients after breast cancer surgery plays an important role in medical tasks such as diagnosis and treatment planning. Different prognostic factors for breast cancer outcome appear to be significant predictors for overall survival, but probably form part of a bigger picture comprising many factors. Survival estimations are currently performed by clinicians using the statistical techniques of survival analysis. In this sense, artificial neural networks are shown to be a powerful tool for analysing datasets where there are complicated non-linear interactions between the input data and the information to be predicted. This paper presents a decision support tool for the prognosis of breast cancer relapse that combines a novel algorithm TDIDT (control of induction by sample division method, CIDIM), to select the most relevant prognostic factors for the accurate prognosis of breast cancer, with a system composed of different neural networks topologies that takes as input the selected variables in order for it to reach good correct classification probability. In addition, a new method for the estimate of Bayes' optimal error using the neural network paradigm is proposed. Clinical-pathological data were obtained from the Medical Oncology Service of the Hospital Clinico Universitario of Malaga, Spain. The results show that the proposed system is an useful tool to be used by clinicians to search through large datasets seeking subtle patterns in prognostic factors, and that may further assist the selection of appropriate adjuvant treatments for the individual patient. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据