4.7 Article

Coxiella burnetii modulates Beclin 1 and Bcl-2, preventing host cell apoptosis to generate a persistent bacterial infection

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 421-438

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2009.129

关键词

Beclin 1; Bcl-2; apoptosis; autophagy

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  2. CONICET [5943]
  3. SECTyP (Universidad Nacional de Cuyo)
  4. [20711]
  5. [38420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coxiella burnetii is the etiological agent of the human disease, Q fever, and is an obligate intracellular bacterium that invades and multiplies in a vacuole with lysosomal characteristics. We have previously shown that Coxiella interacts with the autophagic pathway as a strategy for its survival and replication. In addition, recent studies have shown that Coxiella exerts anti-apoptotic activity to maintain the host cell viability, thus generating a persistent infection. In the present report, we have explored the role of Beclin 1 and Bcl-2 in C. burnetii infection to elucidate how this bacterium modulates autophagy and apoptosis to its own benefit. Beclin 1, a Bcl-2 interacting protein, is required for autophagy. In this study, we show that Beclin 1 is recruited to the Coxiella-membrane vacuole, favoring its development and bacterial replication. In contrast, the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 alters the normal development of the Coxiella-replicative compartment, in spite of also being recruited to the vacuole membrane. Furthermore, both vacuole development and the anti-apoptotic effect of C. burnetii are affected by Beclin 1 depletion and by the expression of a Beclin 1 mutant defective in Bcl-2 binding. Overall, these findings indicate that C. burnetii infection modulates autophagy and apoptotic pathways through Beclin 1/Bcl-2 interplay to establish a successful infection in the host cell. Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 421-438; doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.129; published online 2 October 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据