4.7 Article

DNA-damage response, survival and differentiation in vitro of a human neural stem cell line in relation to ATM expression

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 795-806

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2009.10

关键词

neural stem cell; neurodegeneration; ataxia-telangiectasia; ATM kinase; DNA damage; shRNA

资金

  1. Telethon [GGP05226B]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health
  3. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC)
  4. Cariplo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by defects in the ATM kinase, a component of the DNA-damage response (DDR). Here, we employed an immortalized human neural stem-cell line (ihNSC) capable of differentiating in vitro into neurons, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes to assess the ATM-dependent response and outcome of ATM ablation. The time-dependent differentiation of ihNSC was accompanied by an upregulation of ATM and DNA-PK, sharp downregulation of ATR and Chk1, transient induction of p53 and by the onset of apoptosis in a fraction of cells. The response to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA lesions was normal, as attested by the phosphorylation of ATM and some of its substrates (e. g., Nbs1, Smc1, Chk2 and p53), and by the kinetics of gamma-H2AX nuclear foci formation. Depletion in these cells of ATM by shRNA interference (shATM) attenuated the differentiation-associated apoptosis and response to IR, but left unaffected the growth, self-renewal and genomic stability. shATM cells generated a normal number of MAP2/beta-tubulin III + neurons, but a reduced number of GalC + oligodendrocytes, which were nevertheless more susceptible to oxidative stress. Altogether, these findings highlight the potential of ihNSCs as an in vitro model system to thoroughly assess, besides ATM, the role of DDR genes in neurogenesis and/or neurodegeneration. Cell Death and Differentiation (2009) 16, 795-806; doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.10; published online 20 February 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据