4.7 Article

Brn-3a/POU4F1 interacts with and differentially affects p73-mediated transcription

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 1266-1278

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2008.45

关键词

apoptosis; Brn-3a; POU4F1; neuronal differentiation; p73; transcription

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U132670600, G9901318] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G9901318, MC_U132670600] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U132670600, G9901318] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Telethon [GGP04110] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Brn-3a/POU4F1 POU transcription factor is critical for the survival and differentiation of specific sensory neurons during development or upon injury; by regulating expression of target genes, either directly or indirectly upon interaction with other proteins. In this study, we demonstrated the physical interaction of Brn-3a with different p73 isoforms and showed co-localization in sensory neurons arising from the neural crest. The biological effects of p73/Brn-3a interaction depend on the particular p73 isoform, because co-expression of Brn-3a with TAp73 enhanced cell cycle arrest, whereas Brn-3a and DNp73 cooperated to increase protection from apoptosis. Brn-3a antagonized TAp73 transactivation of pro-apoptotic Bax, but cooperated to increase transcription of the cell cycle regulator p21(CIP1/Waf1). The region 425-494 amino acids within the TAp73 C terminus were critical for Brn-3a to repress Bax transactivation, but not for cooperation on the p21(CIP1/Waf1) promoter. Our results suggest that co-factors binding to the p73 C terminus facilitate maximal activation on the Bax but not p21(CIP1/Waf1) promoter and that Brn-3a modulates this interaction. Thus, the physical interaction of Brn-3a with specific p73 isoforms will be critical for determining cell fate during neuronal development or in injured neurons expressing both factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据