4.6 Review

The transcription factor p53: Not a repressor, solely an activator

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 3037-3058

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/15384101.2014.949083

关键词

CDKN1A; DREAM complex; E2F; RB complex; genome-wide meta-analysis; p53; CDE; cell cycle-dependent element; CHR; cell cycle genes homology region; DREAM; DP; RB-like; E2F4; and MuvB complex; ChIP; chromatin immunoprecipitation; NF-Y; Nuclear factor Y; cdk; cyclin-dependent kinase; HPV; human papilloma virus

资金

  1. Fritz Thyssen Foundation
  2. grant Origins and Evolution of Regulation in Biological Systems [24332]
  3. John Templeton Foundation
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) through Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) at the University of Leipzig

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The predominant function of the tumor suppressor p53 is transcriptional regulation. It is generally accepted that p53-dependent transcriptional activation occurs by binding to a specific recognition site in promoters of target genes. Additionally, several models for p53-dependent transcriptional repression have been postulated. Here, we evaluate these models based on a computational meta-analysis of genome-wide data. Surprisingly, several major models of p53-dependent gene regulation are implausible. Meta-analysis of large-scale data is unable to confirm reports on directly repressed p53 target genes and falsifies models of direct repression. This notion is supported by experimental re-analysis of representative genes reported as directly repressed by p53. Therefore, p53 is not a direct repressor of transcription, but solely activates its target genes. Moreover, models based on interference of p53 with activating transcription factors as well as models based on the function of ncRNAs are also not supported by the meta-analysis. As an alternative to models of direct repression, the meta-analysis leads to the conclusion that p53 represses transcription indirectly by activation of the p53-p21-DREAM/RB pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据