4.6 Article

Construction of synthetic nucleoli and what it tells us about propagation of sub-nuclear domains through cell division

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 2501-2508

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/15384101.2014.949124

关键词

cell cycle; mitotic bookmarking; nuclear bodies; nucleolus; Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR); neo-NOR; neonucleoli; pseudo-NOR; synthetic biology; UBF; 1 degrees; primary; 2 degrees; secondary; CBs; Cajal bodies; CDK; cyclin-dependent kinase; DFC; dense fibrillar component; DJ; distal junction; FCs; fibrillar centers; GC; granular component; HLBs; histone locus bodies; IGS; intergenic spacers; HMG; high mobility group; NBs; nuclear bodies; NORs; nucleolar organizer regions; PJ; proximal junction; PML; promyelocytic leukemia; PNBs; pre-nucleolar bodies; pol; RNA polymerase; pre-rRNA; precursor rRNA; rDNA; ribosomal genes; rRNA; ribosomal RNA; RNP; ribonucleoprotein; TFs; transcription factors; t-UTPs; transcription U 3 proteins; UBF; Upstream binding factor; XEn; Xenopus enhancer

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (PI) [07/IN.1/B924]
  2. IRCSET
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/IN.1/B924] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cell nucleus is functionally compartmentalized into numerous membraneless and dynamic, yet defined, bodies. The cell cycle inheritance of these nuclear bodies (NBs) is poorly understood at the molecular level. In higher eukaryotes, their propagation is challenged by cell division through an open mitosis, where the nuclear envelope disassembles along with most NBs. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved can be achieved using the engineering principles of synthetic biology to construct artificial NBs. Successful biogenesis of such synthetic NBs demonstrates knowledge of the basic mechanisms involved. Application of this approach to the nucleolus, a paradigm of nuclear organization, has highlighted a key role for mitotic bookmarking in the cell cycle propagation of NBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据