4.8 Article

Inducible nitric oxide synthase is required in alcohol-induced liver injury: Studies with knockout mice

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 1834-1844

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.08.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES050117, Z01ES050117] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Oxidative stress contributes to early alcohol-induced liver injury, and superoxide (O-2(.)-) production from NADPH oxidase plays a key role. However, the production of the free radical nitric oxide (NO.) by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) could also be involved. Methods: To test this hypothesis, iNOS knockout (B6.129P2-Nos2(tm1 Lau)) and wild-type mice were fed high-fat control or ethanol-containing diets for 4 weeks. Results: Mean body weight gains were not significantly different between treatment groups, and average urine ethanol concentrations were similar in wild-type and iNOS knockout mice. After 4 weeks, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were increased significantly about 4-fold over control values (29 +/- IU/L) by enteral ethanol (113 +/- 20) in wild-type mice; this effect of ethanol was significantly blunted in iNOS knockout mice (50 +/- 9). Similar protective effects against liver damage were observed if wild-type mice were treated with the iNOS inhibitor N-(3-aminomethyl)benzyl-acetamindine (1400W). Enteral ethanol also caused severe fatty accumulation, mild inflammation, and necrosis in the liver in wild-type mice but had no effect in iNOS knockout mice. The accumulation of 4-hydroxynonenal (lipid peroxidation) and 3-nitrotyrosine (reactive nitrogen species formation) protein adducts caused by alcohol was completely blocked in iNOS knockout mice. Conclusions: These data strongly support the hypothesis that iNOS is required for the pathogenesis of early alcohol-induced hepatitis by production of nitric oxide-derived pro-oxidants (e.g., peroxynitrite).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据