4.7 Article

Polymeric IgA1 from patients with IgA nephropathy upregulates transforming growth factor-beta synthesis and signal transduction in human mesangial cells via the renin-angiotensin system

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 3127-3137

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000095639.56212.BF

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of polymeric IgA1 (pIgA1) and monomeric IgA1 (mIgA1) from patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and TGF-beta synthesis were examined in cultured human mesangial cells (HMC). Both pIgA1 and mIgA1 induced renin gene expression in HMC, in a dose-dependent manner. Similar findings were observed for TGF-beta gene and protein expression. The values measured in HMC incubated with pIgA1 were significantly higher than those in HMC incubated with equivalent amounts of mIgA1. When similar experiments were performed with the addition of either captopril or losartan, there was a significant increase in the renin gene expression by HMC, whereas the synthesis of TGF-beta was markedly reduced. The TGF-beta signal transduction pathways in HMC were studied by measuring the receptor-regulated Smad proteins (Smad 2 and 3) and common-partner Smad proteins (Smad 4). pIgA1 from patients with IgAN upregulated Smad activity in HMC, and the activity observed in HMC that had been preincubated with pIgA1 was readily suppressed with optimal concentrations of captopril or losartan. The effects of pIgA1 on the RAS were further examined in HNIC incubated with IgA isolated from 30 patients with IgAN, 30 healthy subjects, and disease control subjects with other diseases. pIgA1 induction of angiotensin II or TGF-beta synthesis in HNIC was significantly greater with preparations from patients with IgAN, compared with healthy or disease control subjects. The findings support a pathogenetic role of pIgA1 in IgAN through upregulation of the RAS and TGF-beta, leading to chronic renal failure with renal fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据