4.6 Article

Protein phosphatase PP4 is involved in NHEJ-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 11, 期 14, 页码 2643-2649

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.20957

关键词

protein phosphatase PP4; DNA double-strand break repair; nonhomologous end joining; KAP1; DNA repair

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130017, 31071190, 30711120570, 30700420]
  2. 973 project [2010CB911904]
  3. Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality [PHR20110508]
  4. Beijing Nova Program [2007B062]
  5. Beijing Natural Science Foundation
  6. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [KM200910028012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reversible phosphorylation is an essential posttranslational modification to turn on/off a protein function and to regulate many cellular activities, including DNA repair. A DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the most lethal form of DNA damage and is mainly fixed by the error-prone nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)-mediated repair and by the high-fidelity homology recombination (HR)-mediated repair. We found previously that protein phosphatase PP 4 is required for HR-mediated DSB repair. In this report, we showed that depletion of PP 4C by siRNA compromised NHEJ-mediated repair of DSBs induced by the nuclease I-SceI. Both PP 4C and its regulatory subunit PP 4R2 physically interacted with the chromatin condensation factor KAP1 (KRAB-associated protein 1). Depletion of PP 4C led to sustained phosphorylation of KAP1 at Ser824. Conversely, overexpression of PP 4C resulted in a decrease of KAP1 phosphorylation. PP 4 dephosphorylated pKAP1 in vitro. Inhibition of KAP1 expression resulted in a defect on NHEJ-mediated DSB repair, and co-depletion of PP 4C and KAP1 did not have significant synergistic effect on NHEJ-mediated DSB repair. Taken together, our results suggest that PP 4C and KAP1 are in the same epistasis group, and PP 4 is involved in NHEJ-mediated DSB repair, possibly through regulating the phosphorylation status of KAP1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据