4.6 Article

Autophagy is required for the activation of NFκB

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 194-199

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.11.1.18669

关键词

AMPK; A549; autophagosomes; DNA damage foci; HCT 116; LC3

资金

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipes labelisee)
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Fondation Axa (Chair For Longevity Research)
  4. European Commission
  5. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  6. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  7. ANR, Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  8. Belgian InterUniversity Attraction Pole
  9. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  10. INCa
  11. Ministere de la Recherche et des Technologies
  12. Junta de Extremadura (Spain)
  13. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan
  14. EMBO
  15. Apo-Sys

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well-established that the activation of the inhibitor of NF kappa B (I kappa B alpha) kinase (IKK) complex is required for autophagy induction by multiple stimuli. Here, we show that in autophagy-competent mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), distinct autophagic triggers, including starvation, mTOR inhibition with rapamycin and p53 inhibition with cyclic pifithrin alpha, lead to the activation of IKK, followed by the phosphorylation-dependent degradation of I kappa B alpha and nuclear translocation of NF kappa B. Remarkably, the NF kappa B signaling pathway was blocked in MEFs lacking either the essential autophagy genes Atg5 or Atgh7. In addition, we found that tumor necrosis factor a (TNF alpha)-induced NF kappa B nuclear translaction is abolished in both Atg5- and Atg7-deficient MFFs. Similarly, the depletion of essential autophagy modulator, including Atg5, Atg7, Beclin 1 and VPS34, RNA interference inhibited TNG alpha-deriven NF kappa B activation in two human cancer cell lines. In conclusion, it appears that, at least in some instances, autophagy is required for NF kappa B activation, highlighting an intimate crosstalk between these two stress-response signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据