4.8 Article

Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 105-117

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2003.50013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: One year of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B results in histologic improvement. We aimed to assess the histological impact of longer-term treatment. Methods: Sets of 3 liver biopsies, from 63 patients before and after I year of randomized lamivudine treatment and after 2 years of further open-label treatment, were assigned Histologic Activity Index scores under code. Results: At the end of year 1, 36/63 (57%) showed greater than or equal to2 point improvement and 24/63 (38%) no change in necroinflammatory activity; after 2 additional years of lamivudine, 38/63 (60%) remained stable and 12/63 (19%) continued to improve. Worsening occurred in similar proportions of patients with and without YMDD (tyrosine, methionine, aspartate, aspartate) variants. After all 3 years of lamivudine treatment, 35/63 (56%) of patients showed improvement, 21/63 (33%) no change, and 7/63 (11%) worsening. Those without, compared with those with, YMDD variants were more likely to improve (17/22 [77%] vs. 18/41 [44%]) and less likely to deteriorate (1/22 [5%] vs. 6/41 [15%]). Patients with YMDD variants for >2 years were least likely to improve (8/22 [36%]). Bridging fibrosis improved by greater than or equal to1 level in 12/19 (63%), and cirrhosis improved (score of 4 to less than or equal to3) in 8/11 (73%). Only 1/52 [2%]) showed progression to cirrhosis, and 3/34 (9%) showed progression to bridging fibrosis (all with YMDD variants). Conclusions: Three years of lamivudine therapy reduces necroinflammatory activity and reverses fibrosis (including cirrhosis) in most patients. The emergence of YMDD variants blunts histologic responses; therefore, extended-duration YMDD variants may require additional therapies to maintain the histological benefit of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据