4.6 Article

Alzheimer Aβ disrupts the mitotic spindle and directly inhibits mitotic microtubule motors

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 1397-1410

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.9.15478

关键词

aneuploidy; Alzheimer disease; Eg5; KIF4A; MCAK; amyloid

资金

  1. Byrd Alzheimer's Institute
  2. Eric Pfeiffer Chair for Research on Alzheimer's Disease
  3. NIA [AG25711]
  4. Martha and James Porter Equipment grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy are greatly induced in Alzheimer disease and models thereof by mutant forms of the APP and PS proteins and by their product, the A beta peptide. Here we employ human somatic cells and Xenopus egg extracts to show that A beta impairs the assembly and maintenance of the mitotic spindle. Mechanistically, these defects result from A beta's inhibition of mitotic motor kinesins, including Eg5, KIF4A and MCAK. In vitro studies show that oligomeric A beta directly inhibits recombinant MCAK by a noncompetitive mechanism. In contrast, inhibition of Eg5 and KIF4A is competitive with respect to both ATP and microtubules, indicating that A beta interferes with their interactions with the microtubules of the mitotic spindle. Consistently, increased levels of polymerized microtubules or of the microtubule stabilizing protein Tau significantly decrease the inhibitory effect of A beta on Eg5 and KIF4A. Together, these results indicate that by disrupting the interaction between specific kinesins and microtubules and by exerting a direct inhibitory effect on the motor activity, excess A beta deregulates the mechanical forces that govern the spindle and thereby leads to the generation of defective mitotic structures. The resulting defect in neurogenesis can account for the over 30% aneuploid/hyperploid, degeneration-prone neurons observed in Alzheimer disease brain. The finding of mitotic motors including Eg5 in mature post-mitotic neurons implies that their inhibition by A beta may also disrupt neuronal function and plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据