4.7 Article

Plasma levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine and adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 21, 页码 1912-1919

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.08.013

关键词

asymmetrical dimethylarginine; nitric oxide; percutaneous coronary intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We investigated the predictive value of plasma concentration of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) on clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results One-hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients with stable angina and undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled for clinical follow-up. Plasma ADMA levels were determined before procedure by high performance liquid chromatography. The major adverse cardiovascular events included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization of target vessels. Patients were grouped into tertiles according to their plasma ADMA levels. Over a follow-up period of 16 months (median), cardiovascular events occurred in 6 patients of tertile I (<0.50 muM), in 17 patients of tertile II (0.50-0.62 muM), and in 28 patients of tertile III (>0.62 muM), P<0.001. By multivariate analysis, tertiles of ADMA levels were independently associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events after PCI (relative risk: tertile II vs I: 3.0 [1.2-7.7], P=0.022; tertile III vs I: 5.3 [2.2-12.9], P<0.001). Moreover, plasma ADMA level in the highest tertile also appeared as a significant risk factor of subsequent death and non-fatal myocardial infarction after PCI (tertile III vs I, P=0.04). Conclusion Pre-procedural plasma ADMA levels may independently predict subsequent adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing PCI. Measurement of plasma ADMA levels could provide a rationale for risk stratification of patients by measuring ADMA levels before intervention. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据