4.7 Article

Linkage analysis of a composite factor for the multiple metabolic syndrome - The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study

期刊

DIABETES
卷 52, 期 11, 页码 2840-2847

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2840

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL56563, U01 HL56564, U01 HL56569, U01 HL56568, U01HL56566, U01 HL56567, 1T32-HL07972-01, U01 HL56565] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [U01HL056565, T32HL007972, U01HL056564, U01HL056567, U01HL056568, U01HL056566, U01HL056563, U01HL056569] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have demonstrated significant genetic and phenotypic correlation underlying the clustering of traits involved in the multiple metabolic syndrome (MMS). The aim of this study was to identify chromosomal regions contributing to MMS-related traits represented by composite factors derived from factor analysis. Data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Family Heart Study were subjected to a maximum likelihood-based factor analysis. These analyses generated an MMS factor that was loaded by BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, subscapular skinfold, triglycerides, HDL, homeostasis model assessment index, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen, and serum uric acid. Genetic data were obtained for 2,467 subjects from 387 three-generation families (402 markers, the NHLBI Mammalian Genotyping Service) and 1,082 subjects from 256 sibships (243 markers, the Utah Molecular Genetics Laboratory). Multipoint variance components linkage analysis (GENEHUNTER version 2.1) of the MMS factor was conducted in the combined marker set sample. The greatest evidence for linkage was found on chromosome 2, with a peak LOD of 3.34 at 240 cM. Suggestive linkage was also observed for regions on chromosomes 7, 12, 14, and 15. In summary, a genomic region on chromosome 2 may contain a pleiotropic locus contributing to the clustering of MMS-related phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据