4.6 Article

Dust and molecules in the local group galaxy NGC 6822 - III. The first-ranked HII region complex Hubble V

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 397, 期 1, 页码 87-97

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021464

关键词

galaxies : individual : NGC 6822; galaxies : ISM; galaxies : irregular; galaxies : Local Group; radio lines : ISM; ISM : molecules

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present maps of the first-ranked HII region complex Hubble V in the metal-poor Local Group dwarf galaxy NGC 6822 in the first four transitions of (CO)-C-12, the 158 mum transition of C+, the 21-cm line of HI, the Pabeta line of HII, and the continuum at 21 cm and 2.2 mum wavelengths. We have also determined various integrated intensities, notably of HCO+ and nearIR H-2 emission. Although the second-ranked HII region Hubble X is located in a region of relatively strong HI emission, our mapping failed to reveal any significant CO emission from it. The relatively small CO cloud complex associated with Hubble V is comparable in size to the ionized HII region. The CO clouds are hot (T-kin = 150 K) and have high molecular gas densities (n(H-2) approximate to 10(4) cm(-3)). Molecular hydrogen probably extends well beyond the CO boundaries. C+ column densities are more than an order of magnitude higher than those of CO. The total mass of the complex is about 10(6) M-. and molecular gas accounts for more than half of this. The complex is excited by luminous stars reddened or obscured at visual, but apparent at near-infrared wavelengths. The total embedded stellar mass may account for about 10% of the total mass, and the mass of ionized gas for half of that. Hubble V illustrates that modest star formation efficiencies may be associated with high CO destruction efficiencies in low-metallicity objects. The analysis of the Hubble V photon-dominated region (PDR) confirms in an independent manner the high value of the CO-to-H-2 conversion factor X found earlier, characteristic of starforming low-metallicity regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据