4.7 Article

Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrolective cohort study

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 46, 期 12, 页码 1611-1617

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-003-1238-x

关键词

body mass index; glimepiride; glibenclamide; retrolective; Type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis. Our study compared the effects of glimepiride or glibenclamide treatment on body weight over 12 months of treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes in routine outpatient practice. Methods. This new retrospective study design used data from physicians in a restricted manner (retrolective). Data from case report forms from 520 patients from 91 randomly selected centres were assessed and covariance analysis performed. Results. The influence of practice and patient characteristics on treatment assignment was low, reflecting the design of randomised controlled trials. Mean weight loss and reduction in body mass index from baseline to study endpoint were greater with glimepiride than with glibenclamide (-2.04+/-3.99 kg vs -0.58+/-3.65 kg, p<0.001; -0.71+/-1.38 kg/m(2) vs -0.20+/-1.28 kg/m(2), p<0.001). Duration of treatment at baseline influenced treatment outcome, but propensity score, sex, age and fasting blood glucose at baseline did not. Both glimepiride and glibenclamide led to decreases in fasting blood glucose (-2.43+/-0.24 mmol/l vs -3.03+/-0.24 mmol/l; p<0.001 vs baseline) and HbA(1c) (-1.23+/-0.09% vs -1.26+/-0.09%; p<0.001 vs baseline). Both treatments were associated with a decrease in serum total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Triglycerides were lower in the glibenclamide group and high density lipoprotein cholesterol was higher in the glimepiride group only. Conclusions/interpretation. Initial treatment of Type 2 diabetes with glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater decrease in body weight and body mass index than treatment with glibenclamide, while providing equivalent glycaemic control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据