4.6 Article

The lung pulse: an early ultrasound sign of complete atelectasis

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2187-2192

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1930-9

关键词

atelectasis; ultrasound diagnosis; intensive care unit; lung, ultrasound diagnosis; thorax, ultrasound diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Complete atelectasis can be immediately generated by selective intubation. A dynamic lung ultrasound sign can be described as the association of absent lung sliding with the perception of heart activity at the pleural line, a sign which was called lung pulse. We examined whether this sign be used promptly to confirm complete atelectasis due to selective intubation. Design and setting. Prospective study in the medical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients. Consecutive patients with no history of respiratory disorders and needing intubation were enrolled. Fifteen patients with selective intubation of the right lung were compared with 30 patients with nonselective intubation and 15 healthy volunteers. Interventions. The lung pulse was sought at the left anterolateral chest wall in intubated patients. Healthy subjects were studied during breathing and apnea. Results. A left lung pulse was immediately present in 14 of 15 patients with right selective intubation, and absent, with normal lung sliding, in all 30 correctly intubated patients and in all 15 healthy subjects during breathing. All healthy subjects exhibited a lung pulse in apnea. The lung pulse had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of complete atelectasis following selective intubation in patients without previous respiratory disorders. Conclusions. The lung pulse is a sign of complete atelectasis which is observable immediately before radiological changes. Its absence which is correlated with the absence of selective intubation and of conserved lung inflation can eliminate the need for confirmation radiography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据