4.8 Article

SOURCE: a unified genomic resource of functional annotations, ontologies, and gene expression data

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 219-223

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg014

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01 CA085129, CA85129-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM07365, T32 GM007365] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA085129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007365] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The explosion in the number of functional genomic datasets generated with tools such as DNA microarrays has created a critical need for resources that facilitate the interpretation of large-scale biological data. SOURCE is a web-based database that brings together information from a broad range of resources, and provides it in manner particularly useful for genome-scale analyses. SOURCE's GeneReports include aliases, chromosomal location, functional descriptions, GeneOntology annotations, gene expression data, and links to external databases. We curate published microarray gene expression datasets and allow users to rapidly identify sets of co-regulated genes across a variety of tissues and a large number of conditions using a simple and intuitive interface. SOURCE provides content both in gene and cDNA clone-centric pages, and thus simplifies analysis of datasets generated using cDNA microarrays. SOURCE is continuously updated and contains the most recent and accurate information available for human, mouse, and rat genes. By allowing dynamic linking to individual gene or clone reports, SOURCE facilitates browsing of large genomic datasets. Finally, SOURCEs batch interface allows rapid extraction of data for thousands of genes or clones at once and thus facilitates statistical analyses such as assessing the enrichment of functional attributes within clusters of genes. SOURCE is available at http://source.stanford.edu.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据