4.6 Article

A novel effect of DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors -: NFκB inhibition in malignant myeloblasts

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 7, 期 14, 页码 2139-2145

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.7.14.6268

关键词

acute myeloid leukemia; DNA methyltransferase inhibitors; histone deacetylase inhibitors; myelodysplastic syndrome

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  2. Ministere de la Recherche
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  4. Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris
  5. Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie des Professions Independantes
  6. Institut National du Cancer
  7. Fondation de France
  8. Association Laurette Fugain
  9. Cent pour Sang la Vie
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  11. European Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant myeloblasts arising in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are characterized by the constitutive activation of the anti-apoptotic transcription factor NF kappa B. We found that DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors (such as azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (such as trichostatin and valproic acid) efficiently induced apoptosis in the P39 MDS/AML cell line, correlating with an inhibition of NF kappa B (which translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm). This effect was obtained rapidly, within a few hours, suggesting that it was not due to epigenetic reprogramming. Indeed, DNMT and HDAC inhibitors reduced the phosphorylation of the NF kappa B-activating kinase IKK alpha/beta, and this effect was also observed in enucleated cells. Finally, circulating myeloblasts from AML patients treated with the DNMT inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine manifested a rapid (2 hours post-treatment) inhibition of NF kappa B and IKK alpha/beta. Altogether, these results indicate that DNMT and HDAC inhibitors can inhibit the constitutive activation of NF kappa B in malignant myeloblasts in vitro and in vivo through a novel mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据