4.7 Article

Polymorphisms of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene in subjects susceptible to high-altitude pulmonary edema

期刊

CHEST
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 54-58

出版社

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.1.54

关键词

carotid body; high-altitude pulmonary edema; hypoxic ventilaton response; polymorphism; tyrosine hydroxylase gelle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study objectives: A blunted hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) has been observed in some sufferers of high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), and was proposed as a potential mechanism in its pathogenesis. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is a rate-limiting enzyme in the carotid body responding to hypoxia to synthesize dopamine neurotransmitter to heighten ventilation. The association of constitutional susceptibility to HAVE regarding the blunted HVR aspect with polymorphisms of the TH gene was examined. Design: A cross-sectional case control study. Setting: Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan. Participants: Forty-three subjects with a history of RAPE (HAPE group) and 51 healthy climbers without a history of RAPE (control group). Measurements: The (TCAT)n tetranucleotide microsatellite repeats within intron I and Met8Val variant in exon 2 of the TH gene were investigated by polymerase chain reaction following either direct sequencing or restriction fragment length polymorphism. The HVR ill 21 subjects among the RAPE group was also measured. Results: No significant frequency differences could be found in terms of either of the two polymorphisms between the RAPE and control groups. Meanwhile, no relationships were observed between the HVR values of RAPE subjects and the individual alleles in both polymorphisms of the TH gene. Conclusion: The genetic susceptibility of HAPE, specifically the blunted HVR in HAPE, is probably not associated with the mutations of the TH gene, implying that these two polymorphisms may not be a sufficient genetic marker for predicting a predisposition to the susceptibility to HAPE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据