4.5 Article

Regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 promoter activity by FKHR and HOXA10 in primate endometrial cells

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 24-30

出版社

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009316

关键词

decidua; female reproductive tract; gene regulation; implantation; uterus

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R29HD036887, R01HD036887, R01HD036759] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD36759, HD36887] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) is abundantly expressed in the liver and decidualized endometrium. FKHR, a FOXO forkhead transcription factor, stimulates IGFBP-1 promoter activity in liver cells through the insulin response sequences (IRSs). HOXA10, a homeobox transcription factor, is important in the decidualization process. Here we show that FKHR and HOXA10 are expressed in baboon endometrium during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Levels are lowest during the follicular phase and highest in pregnancy. Reporter gene studies reveal that FKHR stimulates both baboon and human IGFBP-1 promoter activity, whereas HOXA10 alone has a relatively weak effect. When FKHR and HOXA10 are expressed together, promoter activity is markedly up-regulated, which is indicative of cooperativity. A DNA binding-deficient FKHR mutant fails to stimulate promoter activity, even in the presence of HOXA10, and deletion or mutation of IRSs also disrupts the effect of FKHR and cooperativity with HOXA10. Conversely, the IRS region placed upstream of the 31 base pair IGFBP-1 minimal promoter is sufficient to mediate effects of FKHR and cooperativity with HOXA10. Pull-down studies reveal physical association between GST-FKHR and S-35-HOXA10. These studies show that FKHR and HOXA10 interact directly and can function cooperatively to stimulate IGFBP-1 promoter activity in endometrial cells and perhaps in other settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据