4.7 Article

DNA damage and apoptosis induced by a potent orally podophyllotoxin derivative in breast cancer

期刊

CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-018-0263-9

关键词

Breast cancer; Topoisomerasell; DNA damage; p53; Mdm2

资金

  1. Municipal Twelfth Five-year Major projects of the People's Republic of China [2013HXW-13]
  2. China National Natural Sciences Foundation [81202556]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Targeting Topoisomerasell (Topoll) and generate enzyme mediated DNA damage is an effective strategy for treatment of breast cancer. Topoll is known as a validated target for drug discovery and cancer chemotherapy. Methods: XWL-1-48, a new orally podophyllotoxin derivative, was designed and synthesized. The effect of XWL-1-48 on Topoll binding and activity was determined by molecular docking software and kDNA-decatenation assay, respectively. In vitro and in vivo breast cancer models were used to document the antitumor activity of XWL-1-48. Cellular apoptosis, cell cycle and ROS were analyzed by flow cytometry. Alteration of XWL-1-48-mediated downstream pathways was determined by western blot analysis. Results: The cytotoxicity of XWL-1-48 is more potent than that of its congener GL331. Molecular docking demonstrated that XWL-1-48 could bind to Topoll through forming two strong hydrogen bonds and potential pi-pi interactions. Noticeably, XWL-1-48 exerts potent antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo breast cancer model. Treatment with XWL-1-48 caused ROS generation and triggered DNA damage through induction of gamma-H2AX and activation of ATM/p53/p21 pathway. Further studies showed that XWL-1-48 led to S-phase arrest and mitochondrial apoptosis. Meanwhile, XWL-1-48 significantly blocked PI3K/Akt/Mdm2 pathway and enhanced Mdm2 degradation. Conclusion: XWL-1-48 may be a promising orally topoll inhibitor, its mechanisms are associated with suppression of Topoll, induction of DNA damage and apoptosis, blockage of PI3K/AKT/Mdm2 pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据