4.7 Review

Signaling pathway cross talk in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1478-811X-12-23

关键词

Neurodegeneration; Cognitive decline; Neuronal network failure; Reactive oxygen species; Alzheimer's disease

资金

  1. Basal Centre for Excellence in Science and Technology [PFB 12/2007]
  2. FONDECYT [1120156, 11130033]
  3. MIFAB Foundation
  4. Fundacion Ciencia y Vida
  5. CONYCIT fellowship
  6. Alzheimer's Australia
  7. NHMRC Early Career Postdoctoral Research Fellowship at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous studies suggest energy failure and accumulative intracellular waste play a causal role in the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in particular. AD is characterized by extracellular amyloid deposits, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, cholinergic deficits, synaptic loss, inflammation and extensive oxidative stress. These pathobiological changes are accompanied by significant behavioral, motor, and cognitive impairment leading to accelerated mortality. Currently, the potential role of several metabolic pathways associated with AD, including Wnt signaling, 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1, silent mating-type information regulator 2 homolog 1), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator 1-alpha (PGC-1 alpha) have widened, with recent discoveries that they are able to modulate several pathological events in AD. These include reduction of amyloid-beta aggregation and inflammation, regulation of mitochondrial dynamics, and increased availability of neuronal energy. This review aims to highlight the involvement of these new set of signaling pathways, which we have collectively termed anti-ageing pathways, for their potentiality in multi-target therapies against AD where cellular metabolic processes are severely impaired.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据