4.6 Article

Men and women differ in lipoprotein response to dietary saturated fat and cholesterol restriction

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 133, 期 11, 页码 3428-3433

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3428

关键词

gender; lipoproteins; lipoprotein subclasses; low fat diet; low cholesterol diet

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL39236] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A diet restricted in saturated fat and cholesterol is recommended for subjects with elevated LDL cholesterol concentrations before and during drug therapy. Gender differences in lipoprotein subspecies response to such diets have not been studied in detail. We examined the effects of a diet low in total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol (Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes, TLC, diet: 26% of energy as fat, 4% as saturated fat, and 45 mg cholesterol/4.2 MJ), compared with an average American diet (AAD: 35% of energy as fat, 14% as saturated fat, and 147 mg cholesterol/4.2 MJ), on plasma lipoprotein subspecies in men and women. Each diet period lasted 6 wk. Body weight was kept constant during each diet period. Men (n = 19) and postmenopausal women (n = 14) >40 y old with moderate hypercholesterolemia participated in this study. Plasma lipoprotein concentrations were assessed by standardized methodology, and lipoprotein sizes were determined by gradient gel electrophoresis and NMR spectroscopy. The TLC diet resulted in greater reductions in total cholesterol and plasma apolipoprotein B concentrations in men than in women (-19% vs. -12%, P < 0.05, and -18% vs. -9%, P < 0.05, respectively). Postprandial triacylglycerol and LpAl:All concentrations were reduced in men, but not in women (-15% vs. 8%, P < 0.05, and -9% vs. -2%, respectively, P < 0.05). Similar decreases in LpAl concentrations and LDL and HDL particle size were observed in men and women. These data are consistent with the concept that middle aged/elderly men may have a more favorable lipoprotein response to a low fat, low cholesterol diet than postmenopausal women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据