4.3 Review

Calcium signaling in pancreatic β-cells in health and in Type 2 diabetes

期刊

CELL CALCIUM
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 340-361

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.09.001

关键词

Calcium signaling; beta-Cells; Diabetes

资金

  1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (Brussels)
  2. ARC from the General Direction of Scientific Research of the French Community of Belgium [13/18-051]
  3. Inter-university Poles of Attraction Programme from the Belgian Science Policy [PAI 6/40]
  4. Wellcome Trust [WT098424AIA]
  5. MRC [MR/J0003042/1]
  6. Biological and Biotechnology Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J015873/1]
  7. Diabetes UK [11/0004210]
  8. Royal Society
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J015873/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. BBSRC [BB/J015873/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+](c)) play a crucial role in the control of insulin secretion from the electrically excitable pancreatic beta-cell. Secretion is controlled by the finely tuned balance between Ca2+ influx (mainly through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, but also through voltage-independent Ca2+ channels like store-operated channels) and efflux pathways. Changes in [Ca2+], directly affect [Ca2+] in various organelles including the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, the Golgi apparatus, secretory granules and lysosomes, as imaged using recombinant targeted probes. Because most of these organelles have specific Ca2+ influx and efflux pathways, they mutually influence free [Ca2+] in the others. In this article, we review the mechanisms of control of [Ca2+] in various compartments and particularly the cytosol, the endoplasmic reticulum ([Ca2+](ER)), acidic stores and mitochondrial matrix ([Ca2+](mito)), focusing chiefly on the most important physiological stimulus of beta-cells, glucose. We also briefly review some alterations of beta-cell Ca2+ homeostasis in Type 2 diabetes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据