4.7 Article

Prevalence of delayed gastric emptying in diabetic patients and relationship to dyspeptic symptoms - A prospective study in unselected diabetic patients

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 3116-3122

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3116

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Data on the prevalence of abnormal gastric emptying in diabetic patients are still lacking. The relation between gastric emptying and dyspeptic symptoms assessed during gastric emptying measurement has not yet been investigated. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of delayed gastric emptying in a large cohort of unselected diabetic patients and to investigate the relation between gastric emptying and gastrointestinal sensations experienced in the 2 weeks before and during the test meal, prospectively. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Gastric emptying was evaluated in 186 patients (106 with type 1 diabetes, mean duration of diabetes 11.6 +/- 11.3 years) using 100 mg 13 C-enriched octanoic acid added to a solid meal. RESULTS - Gastric emptying was significantly slower in the diabetic subjects than in the healthy volunteers (T-50: 99.5 +/- 35.4 vs. 76.8 +/- 21.4 min, P < 0.003; Ret(120) (min): 30.6 +/- 17.2 vs. 20.4 +/- 9.7%, P < 0.006). Delayed gastric emptying was observed in 51 (28%) diabetic subjects. The sensations experienced in the 2 weeks before the test were weakly correlated with the sensation scored during the gastric emptying test. Sensations assessed during the gastric emptying test did predict gastric emptying to some extent (r = 0.46, P < 0.0001), whereas sensations experienced in the previous 2 weeks did not. CONCLUSIONS - This prospective study shows that delayed gastric emptying can be observed in 28% of unselected patients with diabetes. Upper gastrointestinal sensations scored during the gastric emptying tests do predict the rate of gastric emptying to some extent and sensation experienced during daily life does not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据