4.7 Article

Cigarette smoking and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes among women

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 89, 期 11, 页码 2087-2092

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601388

关键词

lymphoma; non-Hodgkin; smoking; women; case-control studies

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA062006, ZIACP010123, Z01CP010123] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA062006, CA62006-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies of the relationship between cigarette smoking and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have yielded conflicting results, perhaps because most studies have evaluated the risk for all NHL subtypes combined. Data from a population-based case-control study conducted among women in Connecticut were used to evaluate the impact of cigarette smoking on the risk of NHIL by histologic type, tumour grade, and immunologic type. A total of 601 histologically confirmed, incident cases of NHL and 718 population-based controls provided in-person interviews. A standardised, structured questionnaire was used to collect information on each subject's current smoking status, age at initiation, duration and intensity of smoking, and cumulative lifetime exposure to smoking. Our data suggest that cigarette smoking does not alter the risk of all NHL subtypes combined. However, increased risk of follicular lymphoma appears to be associated with increased intensity and duration of smoking, and cumulative lifetime exposure to smoking. Compared with nonsmokers, women with a cumulative lifetime exposure of 16-33 pack-years and 34 pack-years or greater experience 50% increased risk (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.5) and 80% increased risk (OR = 1,8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2), respectively, of follicular lymphoma (P for linear trend 0.05). Our study findings are consistent with several previous epidemiologic studies suggesting that cigarette smoking increases the risk of follicular lymphoma. This research highlights the importance of distinguishing between NHL subtypes in future research on the aetiology of NHL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据