4.6 Article

Reproducibility and validity of the Shanghai Women's Health Study physical activity questionnaire

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 158, 期 11, 页码 1114-1122

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg255

关键词

data collection; epidemiologic methods; exercise; questionnaires; reproducibility of results; validation studies

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA70867] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA070867] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this investigation, the authors evaluated the reproducibility and validity of the Shanghai Women's Health Study (SWHS) physical activity questionnaire (PAQ), which was administered in a cohort study of approximately 75,000 Chinese women aged 40-70 years. Reproducibility (2-year test-retest) was evaluated using kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was evaluated by comparing Spearman correlations (r) for the SWHS PAQ with two criterion measures administered over a period of 12 months: four 7day physical activity logs and up to 28 7-day PAQs. Women were recruited from the SWHS cohort (n = 200). Results indicated that the reproducibility of adolescent and adult exercise participation (kappa = 0.85 and kappa = 0.64, respectively) and years of adolescent exercise and adult exercise energy expenditure (ICC = 0.83 and ICC = 0.70, respectively) was reasonable. Reproducibility values for adult lifestyle activities were lower (ICC = 0.14-0.54). Significant correlations between the PAQ and criterion measures of adult exercise were observed for the first PAQ administration (physical activity log, r= 0.50; 7-day PAQ, r= 0.62) and the second PAQ administration (physical activity log, r= 0.74; 7-day PAQ, r= 0.80). Significant correlations between PAO lifestyle activities and the 7-day PAO were also noted (r = 0.33-0.88). These data indicate that the SWHS PAO is a reproducible and valid measure of exercise behaviors and that it demonstrates utility in stratifying women by levels of important lifestyle activities (e.g., housework, walking, cycling).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据