4.7 Review

Obesity, sleep apnea, and hypertension

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 1067-1074

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000101686.98973.A3

关键词

hypertension, obesity; sleep apnea syndromes; sympathetic nervous system; insulin resistance

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000585] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL070302, R01HL073211, R01HL065176, R01HL061560] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity has a high and rising prevalence and represents a major public health problem. Obstructive sleep apnea ( OSA) is also common, affecting an estimated 15 million Americans, with a prevalence that is probably also rising as a consequence of increasing obesity. Epidemiologic data support a link between obesity and hypertension as well as between OSA and hypertension. For example, untreated OSA predisposes to an increased risk of new hypertension, and treatment of OSA lowers blood pressure, even during the daytime. Possible mechanisms whereby OSA may contribute to hypertension in obese individuals include sympathetic activation, hyperleptinemia, insulin resistance, elevated angiotensin II and aldosterone levels, oxidative and inflammatory stress, endothelial dysfunction, impaired baroreflex function, and perhaps by effects on renal function. The coexistence of OSA and obesity may have more widespread implications for cardiovascular control and dysfunction in obese individuals and may contribute to some of the clustering of abnormalities broadly defined as the metabolic syndrome. From the clinical and therapeutic perspectives, the presence of resistant hypertension and the absence of a nocturnal decrease in blood pressure in obese individuals should prompt the clinician to consider the diagnosis of OSA, especially if clinical symptoms suggestive of OSA ( such as poor sleep quality, witnessed apnea, excessive daytime somnolence, and so forth) are also present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据