4.4 Article

TNF-α triggers osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells via the NF-κB signalling pathway

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1267-1275

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbin.10141

关键词

dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs); nuclear factor kappaB (NF-B); osteogenic differentiation; tumour necrosis factor (TNF-alpha)

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81172841, 81202368]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Colleges and Universities [09KJB320010, 10KJB320012]
  3. 'Top Six Types of Talents' Financial Assistance of Jiangsu Province
  4. Jiangsu province's Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Program [LJ201135, LJ201136]
  5. Science Foundation of Nantong city [H2011054]
  6. A project from Bureau of Jiangsu Province [Z2010005]
  7. Preventive Medicine Projects from Bureau of Jiangsu Province [Y2012083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are a type of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) characterised by self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation, including chondrocytes, adipocytes, neural cells and osteoblasts, which make it an attractive choice for tissue engineering purposes. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF-) had the positive effect on the mineralisation of bone marrow MSCs and stromal cells derived from human adipose tissue. However, the effect of TNF- on DPSCs is unclear. We found that TNF- activated the NF-B pathway during the osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs. TNF- also increased mineralisation and the expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and collagen type I (COL I) during this process. PDTC, an NF-B inhibitor, blocked the osteogenic differentiation induced by TNF-. No effect of TNF- on proliferation of DPSCs or cell cycle was detected. In summary, TNF- promotes mineralisation and mineralisation-related gene expression through the NF-B signalling pathway in DPSCs, which may provide a foundation for autologous transplantation of DPSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据