4.4 Review

Out with the old, in with the new? Comparing methods for measuring protein degradation

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 457-462

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1042/CBI20110055

关键词

GPSP; metabolic labelling; protein degradation; proteolysis; proteostasis; pulse-chase; SILAC

资金

  1. NIAID Division of Intramural Research
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM077382, NS042892]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein degradation is a critical factor in controlling cellular protein abundance. Here, we compare classical methods for determining protein degradation rates to a novel GFP (green fluorescent protein) fusion protein based method that assesses the intrinsic stability of cloned cDNA library products by flow cytometry [Yen et al. (2008) Science 322, 918]. While no method is perfect, we conclude that chimeric gene reporter approaches, though powerful, should be applied cautiously, due principally to OFF (or other reporter tag) interference with protein organelle targeting or incorporation into macromolecular assemblies, both of which cause spuriously high degradation rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据