4.4 Article

Inhibition of apoptotic signalling in spermine-treated vascular smooth muscle cells by a novel glutathione precursor

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 503-511

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1042/CBI20090349

关键词

antioxidants; apoptosis; chronic kidney disease; spermine; vascular smooth muscle cells

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RR-011145, RR019234, MO1 RR00425]
  2. National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities [MD00182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CKD (chronic kidney disease) is a public health problem, mediated by haemodynamic and non-haemodynamic events including oxidative stress. We investigated the effect of two GSH (glutathione) precursors, NAC (N-acetylcysteine) and cystine as the physiological carrier of cysteine in GSH with added selenomethionine (F1) in preventing spermine (uraemic toxin)-induced apoptosis in cultured human aortic VSMC (vascular smooth muscle cells). VSMCs exposed to spermine (15 mu M) with or without antioxidants (doses 50, 100, 200 and 500 mu g/ml) were assessed for apoptosis, JNK (c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase) activation and iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase) induction and activation of intrinsic pathway signalling. Spermine exposure resulted in activation of JNK and iNOS induction and apoptosis. NAC and F1 (dose range 50-500 mu g/ml) attenuated spermine-induced acceleration of VSMC apoptosis but only F1 (at 200 and 500 mu g/ml) maintained spermine-induced apoptosis at control levels. Spermine-induced JNK activation was prevented by 200 mu g/ml of both NAC and F1, while iNOS induction was blocked only by F1. Notably, the adverse effects of spermine on BAX/BCL-2 ratio, cytochrome c release and caspase activation was fully attenuated by F1. In conclusion, F1 was more effective than NAC in preventing spermine-induced apoptosis and downstream changes in related signal transduction pathways in VSMCs. Further studies are needed to examine the effect of these compounds in preventing CKD-associated vascular disease

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据