4.5 Article

Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 1851-1860

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003

关键词

elderly; muscle power; strength

资金

  1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01MD009164] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [263-MD-821336, 263-MD-9164-13] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcopenia, the reduction of muscle mass and strength that occurs with aging, is widely considered one of the major causes of disability in older persons. Surprisingly, criteria that may help a clinician to identify persons with impaired muscle function are still lacking. Using data from a large representative sample of the general population, we examined how muscle function and calf muscle area change with aging and affect mobility in men and women free of neurological conditions. We tested several putative indicators of sarcopenia, including knee extension isometric torque, handgrip, lower extremity muscle power, and calf muscle area. For each indicator, sarcopenia was considered to be present when the measure was >2 SDs below the mean. For all four measures, the prevalence of sarcopenia increased with age, both in men and women. The age-associated gradient in prevalence was maximum for muscle power and minimum for calf-muscle area. However, lower extremity muscle power was no better than knee-extension torque or handgrip in the early identification of poor mobility, defined either as walking speed <0.8 m/s or inability to walk at least 1 km without difficulty and without developing symptoms. Optimal cutoff values that can be used in the clinical practice to identify older persons with poor mobility were developed. The findings of the study lay the basis for a cost-effective, clinical marker of sarcopenia based on a measure of isometric handgrip strength. Our findings should be verified in a longitudinal study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据