4.2 Article

Comparative gene expression profile of chronic myeloid leukemia cells innately resistant to imatinib mesylate

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 1073-1080

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2003.08.006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Resistance to imatinib mesylate monotherapy is clearly a barrier to successful treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. In some patients, resistance arises due to powerful selective pressure on rare cells that carry amplified copies of the BCR-ABL fusion oncogene or point mutations in the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase domain that affect binding of the drug to the oncoprotein. However, in a proportion of patients neither mechanism operates, and resistance appears to be a priori, existing prior to exposure to the drug. These mechanisms of imatinib resistance are poorly understood and may be heterogeneous. Materials and Methods. We have previously described such innate resistance to imatinib in subclones of a myeloid leukemia cell line, KCL22, in which imatinib exposure inhibits the activity of Bcr-Abl and yet fails to induce apoptosis. We describe here whole-genome expression analysis of imatinib-sensitive and -resistant cells derived from the original KCL22 line, using Affymetrix microarray analysis. Results. We detected differential expression of 39 genes that correlate with the imatinib-resistant phenotype. The resistant cells overexpress several genes associated with the suppression of apoptosis or with conferral of a transformed phenotype. Conclusion. Amongst the differentially-expressed genes correlating with imatinib resistance, several suggest the activation of alternative pathway(s) that maintain viability and growth independently of Bcr-Abl kinase activity. Given the high rate of primary imatinib resistance in blast crisis, the potential of activating such alternative pathways appears to correlate with disease progression. (C) 2003 International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据