4.7 Article

Intrinsic susceptibility to radiation-induced apoptosis of human lymphocyte subpopulations

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00637-0

关键词

radiosensitivity; radiobiology; apoptosis; flow cytometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: With the aim to evaluate intrinsic radiosensitivity, the susceptibility of lymphocyte subpopulations to radiation-induced apoptosis was determined. The investigated parameters included measurement reliability, phenotypic variance, intra- and inter-individual variability, and correlations between radiation-induced and spontaneous apoptosis. Methods and Materials: Quiescent lymphocytes of 63 healthy volunteers, sampled up to four times over a 1-year period were gamma-irradiated in vitro. Subsequent apoptosis (annexin V) was measured for T4-, T8-, and B-lymphocyte subpopulations using 6-color flow cytometry. Spontaneous apoptosis was measured and radiosensitivity was quantified from the dose-effect curves. Results: After thawing and short-term culture, both spontaneous apoptosis as well as radiation-induced apoptosis (radiosensitivity) differed among the three lymphocyte subpopulations, with T4 being most resistant, and B most sensitive. Spontaneous and radiation-induced apoptosis were correlated in all cell types, and variance between individuals was considerably higher than variance within individuals for both. A small but highly significant increase of both spontaneous and radiation-induced apoptosis was observed with age for T8, but not for T4 and B. Radiosensitivity of T8 and B proved to be sex-independent, whereas female T4 lymphocytes were less radiosensitive than those from males. T4 and T8 radiosensitivities were loosely correlated, and neither of them was related to B radiosensitivity. Conclusions: Tendency to spontaneous and radiation-induced apoptosis of lymphocyte subpopulations differs among individuals. In addition, depending on the cell types, age and sex are factors influencing these parameters. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据