4.4 Article

Clinical grade mesenchymal stem cells transdifferentiated under xenofree conditions alleviates motor deficiencies in a rat model of Parkinson's disease

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 830-838

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2009.05.002

关键词

Bone marrow; Clinical grade mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); Cord blood serum (CBS); Dopaminergic neurons; 6-Hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA); Parkinson's disease (PD)

资金

  1. Reliance Life Sciences Pvt Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) is a valid, definitive candidate for repair of damaged tissues in degenerative disorders in general and neurological diseases in particular. We have standardized the processing conditions for proliferation of BMMSCs using xenofree medium and checked their in vitro and in vivo neurogenic potential. Method: The proliferative potential of BMMSCs was analyzed using xenofree media and functionality checked by transplantation into Parkinson's disease (PD) animal models. In vitro neuronal differentiation was investigated by neuronal induction media supplemented with growth factors. Differentiated cells were characterized at cellular and molecular levels. In vitro functionality estimated by dopamine secretion. Results: A pure population of BMMSCs showing an 8-10 fold expansion was obtained using xenofree media. On differentiation to neuronal lineage, they exhibited neuronal morphology. Detectable levels of dopamine (1.93 ng/ml) were secreted into the culture media of differentiated cells. There was a significant behavioural improvement in PD models 3 months post transplantation. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that BMMSCs can be transdifferentiated efficiently into functional dopaminergic neurons both in vitro and in vivo. This holds immense clinical potential as a replacement therapy for PD and other neurodegenerative diseases. (C) 2009 International Federation for Cell Biology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据