4.6 Article

Food grade titanium dioxide disrupts intestinal brush border microvilli in vitro independent of sedimentation

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 169-188

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10565-014-9278-1

关键词

Brush border; Microvilli; Nanotechnology; Sedimentation; Titanium dioxide; Toxicity

资金

  1. NSF [CBET 1336542]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1336542] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bulk-and nano-scale titanium dioxide (TiO2) has found use in human food products for controlling color, texture, and moisture. Once ingested, and because of their small size, nano-scale TiO2 can interact with a number of epithelia that line the human gastrointestinal tract. One such epithelium responsible for nutrient absorption is the small intestine, whose constituent cells contain microvilli to increase the total surface area of the gut. Using a combination of scanning and transmission electron microscopy it was found that food grade TiO2 (E171 food additive coded) included similar to 25 % of the TiO2 as nanoparticles (NPs; <100 nm), and disrupted the normal organization of the microvilli as a consequence of TiO2 sedimentation. It was found that TiO2 isolated from the candy coating of chewing gum and a commercially available TiO2 food grade additive samples were of the anatase crystal structure. Exposure to food grade TiO2 additives, containing nanoparticles, at the lowest concentration tested within this experimental paradigm to date at 350 ng/mL (i.e., 100 ng/cm(2) cell surface area) resulted in disruption of the brush border. Through the use of two independent techniques to remove the effects of gravity, and subsequent TiO2 sedimentation, it was found that disruption of the microvilli was independent of sedimentation. These data indicate that food grade TiO2 exposure resulted in the loss of microvilli from the Caco-2(BBe1) cell system due to a biological response, and not simply a physical artifact of in vitro exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据