4.5 Article

Low dose cocaine self-administration transiently increases but high dose cocaine persistently decreases brain reward function in rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 191-195

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02443.x

关键词

addiction; cocaine; dependence; intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) reward; rat; withdrawal

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA04398, R56 DA011946, DA11946] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R56DA011946, R01DA004398, R01DA011946] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of self-administered cocaine on brain reward function, measured by intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) reward thresholds in rats. Self-administration of 10 and 20 cocaine injections (0.25 mg per injection, equivalent to 4.94 +/- 0.23 and 9.88 +/- 0.46 mg/kg, self-administered over 40 +/- 6.9 and 99 +/- 11.9 min, respectively) lowered reward thresholds 15 min later, indicating a facilitation of rewarding ICSS, but had no effect at 2, 24 or 48 h after administration. Thus, self-administration of low cocaine doses did not cause persistent changes in brain reward function. Forty cocaine injections (19.64 +/- 0.94 mg/kg; self-administered over 185 +/- 10.9 min) also transiently lowered reward thresholds 15 min later, while significant threshold current elevations were observed at 2 and 24 h after administration, indicating persistent withdrawal-like reward deficits. Finally, 80 cocaine injections (39.53 +/- 1.84 mg/kg, self-administered over 376 +/- 19.9 min) significantly elevated thresholds 2 and 48 h after self-administration, but not at 24 h. Threshold currents also tended to be elevated 15 min after self-administration. Overall, these data suggest that as the amount of self-administered cocaine increases the motivation to consume further cocaine may be shifted, from obtaining the rewarding actions of cocaine to avoidance and alleviation of a cocaine-induced negative affective state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据