4.5 Article

Percutaneous ablation therapy guided by contrast-enhanced sonography for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 180, 期 1, 页码 143-149

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800143

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. The newly developed contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography technique enables us to improve the real-time detectability of viable tumor tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. We evaluated the usefulness of real-time percutaneous ablation therapy under guidance with this method for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that is not depicted on conventional sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We examined 30 patients with 56 hepatocellular carcinomas using real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography after injection of a galactose-palmitic acid contrast agent and compared the results with the findings of contrast-enhanced helical CT We performed percutaneous ablation therapy guided by this modality for treatment of viable hepatocellular carcinoma lesions that could not be detected using conventional sonography. RESULTS. High detection rates of viable hepatocellular carcinoma lesions were obtained using real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography (52/56 lesions, 93%); these rates were comparable to those of helical CT (54/56 lesions, 96%). Nine (90%) of the 10 lesions that were not detected on conventional sonography but were depicted on real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography (incomplete local treatment, n = 4; small new lesion, n = 6) were successfully treated with percutaneous ablation therapy guided by this method. CONCLUSION. Real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic gray-scale sonography improved the sensitivity for the detection of viable hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. Percutaneous ablation therapy guided by this modality may be useful in patients with hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma lesions that cannot be detected using conventional sonography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据