4.5 Article

Ethyl pyruvate ameliorates intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in endotoxemic mice and immunostimulated Caco-2 enterocytic monolayers

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.043182

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM058484, R29GM037631, P50GM053789, R01GM037631] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM58484, GM53789, GM37631] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethyl pyruvate (EP) solution ameliorates ileal mucosal hyperpermeability and decreases the expression of several proinflammatory genes in ileal and/or colonic mucosa when it is used instead of Ringer's lactate solution (RLS) to resuscitate mice from hemorrhagic shock. To test the hypothesis that EP can ameliorate gut barrier dysfunction induced by other forms of inflammation, we incubated Caco-2 monolayers for 24 to 48 h with cytomix (a mixture of interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1beta) in the presence or absence of graded concentrations of EP or sodium pyruvate. Cytomix increased the permeability of Caco-2 monolayers to fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextran (FD4; average molecular mass 4 kDa), but this effect was inhibited by adding 0.1 to 10 mM EP (but not similar concentrations of sodium pyruvate) to the culture medium. EP inhibited several other cytomix-induced phenomena, including nuclear factor-kappaB activation, inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression, and nitric oxide production. Cytomix altered the expression and localization of the tight junctional proteins, ZO-1 and occludin, but this effect was prevented by EP. Delayed treatment with EP solution instead of RLS ameliorated ileal mucosal hyperpermeability to FD4 and bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes in mice challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). These data support the view that EP ameliorates cytokine- and/or LPS-induced derangements in intestinal epithelial barrier function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据