4.7 Review

Palladium or platinum complex catalysed reactions of carbonyl and imine compounds with disilanes

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 -, 期 2, 页码 236-243

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b207987a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition metal catalysed reactions of benzaldehydes and benzylideneamines with disilanes have been investigated. Palladium phosphine complexes catalyse the double silylation of the C=O bond in benzaldehydes and the C=N bond in benzylideneamines with 1,2-difluoro-1,1,2,2-tetramethyldisilane to yield alpha-(fluorodimethylsilyl)-alpha-(fluorodimethylsiloxy) toluene and N-methyl-N-(fluorodimethylsilyl)-alpha-(fluorodimethylsilyl) benzylamine respectively. When less activated disilanes such as 1,2-dichloro- and 1,2-dimethoxy-1,1,2,2-tetramethyldisilane were employed, the palladium phosphine complexes were less active and selective, resulting in extensive side reactions inclusive of 1,2-disiloxy-1,2-diphenylethane formation. The reaction of benzophenone with the difluorodisilane formed 2,2-dimethyl-4,4,5,5- tetraphenyl-1,3-dioxa-2-silacyclopentane without affording the corresponding simple double silylation product. The formation of side products such as 1,2-disiloxy-1,2-diphenylethane in the reaction of benzaldehyde and 2,2-dimethyl-4,4,5,5-tetraphenyl-1,3-dioxa-2-silacyclopentane in the reaction of benzophenone appears to suggest intermediacy of radical and silylene species. Tris(dibenzylideneacetone)diplatinum-etpo (etpo = 4-ethyl-1-phospha-2,6,7-trioxabicyclo[2.2.2] octane catalyst system was more active for unactivated disilanes, catalysing double silylation of benzaldehydes with hexamethyldisilane. The same catalyst system was found to catalyse the ortho silylation of benzylideneamines with disilanes via intramolecular C-H activation; both mono- and bis-silylated products were obtained. Reaction rates and product distributions are rationalised in terms of the steric and electronic properties of the disilanes, substrates and the catalyst used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据