4.5 Article

Decline in mortality, AIDS, and hospital admissions in perinatally HIV-1 infected children in the United Kingdom and Ireland

期刊

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 327, 期 7422, 页码 1019-1023

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1019

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To describe changes in demographic factors, disease progression, hospital admissions, and use of antiretroviral therapy in children with HIV. Design Active surveillance through the national study of HIV in pregnancy and childhood (NSHPC and additional data from a subset of children in the collaborative HIV paediatric study (CHIPS). Setting United Kingdom and Ireland. Participants 944 children with perinatally acquired HIV-1 under clinical care. Main outcome measures Changes over time in progression to AIDS and death, hospital admission rates, and use of antiretroviral therapy. Results 944 children with perinatally acquired HIV were reported in the United Kingdom and Ireland by October 2002; 628 (67%) were black African, 205 (22%) were aged ! 10 years at last follow up, 193 (20%) are know to have died. The proportion of children presenting who were born abroad increased from 20% in 1994-5 to 60% during 2000-2. Mortality was stable before 1997 at 9.3 per 100 child years at risk but fell to 2.0 in 2001-2 (trend P < 0.001). Progression to AIDS)S also declined (P < 0.00 1). From 1997 onwards the proportion of children on three or four drug antiretroviral therapy increased. Hospital admission rates declined by 80%, but with more children in follow up the absolute number of admissions fell by only 26%. Conclusion In children with HIV infection, mortality, AIDS, and hospital admission rates have declined substantially since the introduction of three or four drug antiretroviral therapy in 1997. As infected children in the United Kingdom and Ireland are living longer, there is an increasing need to address their medical, social, and psychological needs as they enter adolescence and adult life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据