4.5 Article

Decreased neural damage after spinal cord injury in tPA-deficient mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 43-57

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/08977150360517173

关键词

apoptosis; knock-out mouse; microglia; motor evoked potentials; serine protease; spinal cord injury; tissue plasminogen activator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is a serine protease that converts plasminogen to plasmin. It plays an important role in the nervous system, including the processes of neuronal migration, neurite outgrowth, and neuronal plasticity. tPA has also been suggested to have a role in several neuropathological. conditions, such as cerebral ischemia, seizures, and demyelinating diseases. To investigate the role of tPA in spinal cord injury, wild-type mice and mice with homozygous tPA deficiency (tPA(-/-) mice) were subjected to spinal cord contusion and the differences of hindlimb function, electrophysiological changes, and histopathological changes were assessed for 6 weeks. Functional recovery was greater in tPA(-/-) mice than in wild-type mice throughout the observation period. The time course of myoelectric motor-evoked potentials supported the hindlimb functional findings. Histological examination showed that injured areas were smaller in tPA(-/-) mice than wildtype mice on Luxol fast blue staining or myelin basic protein and neurofilament protein immunostaining at 6 weeks after contusion. Electron microscopy showed that the white matter was better preserved in tPA(-/-) mice than in wild-type mice. The expression of tPA protein was widespread on the first day after contusion and this expression was detected for at least a week. Activation of microglia/macrophages and apoptotic cell death were significantly reduced in tPA(-/-) mice after contusion. This study shows that neural damage is decreased in tPA(-/-) mice after spinal cord injury. Suppression of tPA production may help to decrease secondary injury after spinal cord contusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据