4.8 Article

Influence of HNO3 oxidation on the structure and adsorptive properties of corncob-based activated carbon

期刊

CARBON
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 713-722

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00029-0

关键词

activated carbon; activation; oxidation; adsorption; adsorption properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation of the impact of strong oxidation with HNO3 on the porosity and adsorption characteristics of char and activated carbons. derived from corncobs. is presented. Texture parameters. as obtained front N-2 adsorption at 77 K. showed a considerable decrease in surface area of the activated carbons with enhanced pore widening. The extent of porosity modification was found to depend on the scheme of activation of the precursor. simple carbonization, steam pyrolysis. steam gasification of the char. or chemical activation with H3PO4. Surface-chemical changes were detected by FTIR spectroscopy. where absorption bands assigned to carboxyl, carboxylate, carbonyl, and phenolic groups were observed. A SEM study demonstrated the erosive effect of HNO3. detected by the presence of disintegration of the carbon grains, with the porous structure probably containing very large macropores. As a consequence of the oxidation process, elemental analysis showed high contents of O, H and N. and TG confirmed that the weight loss distribution in the thermogram becomes slower at higher temperatures, The removal of phenol decreased as a result of the formation of oxygen functionalities. Mono-nitrophenols were adsorbed in smaller amounts than phenol. and p-nitrophenol showed a relatively higher uptake than the other two mono-nitrophenols, whereas the uptake of Methylene Blue was improved. Removal of Pb2- front aqueous non-buffered solution was considerably enhanced by chemical oxidation, which may be related to pore widening. increased cation-exchange capacity by oxygen groups, and the promoted hydrophilicity of the carbon Surface. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据