4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Mass spectrometric studies of cisplatin-induced changes of hemoglobin

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 17, 期 24, 页码 2748-2754

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1259

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports on structural changes of hemoglobin (Hb) that were induced by cisplatin binding. Two techniques, nanoelectrospray quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (nanoES-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HPLC/ICPMS), were developed to facilitate this study. Nanospray MS analyses of cisplatin and Hb reaction mixtures demonstrated that the ion at m/z 616.5. the heme group, increased with an increase of cisplatin concentration, indicating the loss of heme groups from the intact protein. This conclusion was also supported by the increase of cisplatin-alpha or -beta complex formation. The change of the Hb-bound Fe was further investigated by monitoring Fe signals using size-exclusion HPLC/ICPMS. After incubation with cisplatin at clinically relevant concentrations, under physiological conditions, the amount of Fe bound to Hb was reduced while formation of cisplatin-Hb complexes increased. Flow-injection ICPMS analysis of the Fe contents in the low molecular weight fraction (<3000 Da) of the reaction mixtures after size fractionation further demonstrated a corresponding increase of Fe with the increase of cisplatin concentrations. HPLC/ICPMS detected three Hb-cisplatin complexes, one of which eluted at the same retention time as Hb while the other two complexes eluted later than Hb. With clinically relevant concentrations of cisplatin (0.05-1.0 muM) and 10 muM of Hb, the concentrations of the Hb-cisplatin complexes were determined in the range 0.1-64 muM. These results, obtained from nanoES-MS, HPLC/ICPMS, and FIA-ICPMS, demonstrate that cisplatin binding to Hb resulted in the dissociation of the heme group from the intact protein. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据