4.4 Article

A new model for fish ion regulation: identification of ionocytes in freshwater- and seawater-acclimated medaka (Oryzias latipes)

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 357, 期 1, 页码 225-243

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-014-1883-z

关键词

Na+-Cl- cotransporter; H+-ATPase; ECaC; NKCC; NHE3; CFTR; Ion regulation; Ionocytes; Medaka

资金

  1. Academia Sinica
  2. National Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ion regulation mechanisms of fishes have been recently studied in zebrafish (Danio rerio), a stenohaline species. However, recent advances using this organism are not necessarily applicable to euryhaline fishes. The euryhaline species medaka (Oryzias latipes), which, like zebrafish, is genetically well categorized and amenable to molecular manipulation, was proposed as an alternative model for studying osmoregulation during acclimation to different salinities. To establish its suitability as an alternative, the present study was conducted to (1) identify different types of ionocytes in the embryonic skin and (2) analyze gene expressions of the transporters during seawater acclimation. Double/triple in situ hybridization and/or immunocytochemistry revealed that freshwater (FW) medaka contain three types of ionocyte: (1) Na+/H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3) cells with apical NHE3 and basolateral Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter (NKCC), Na+-K+-ATPase (NKA) and anion exchanger (AE); (2) Na+-Cl- cotransporter (NCC) cells with apical NCC and basolateral H+-ATPase; and (3) epithelial Ca2+ channel (ECaC) cells [presumed accessory (AC) cells] with apical ECaC. On the other hand, seawater (SW) medaka has a single predominant ionocyte type, which possesses apical cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and NHE3 and basolateral NKCC and NKA and is accompanied by smaller AC cells that express lower levels of basolateral NKA. Reciprocal gene expressions of decreased NHE3, AE, NCC and ECaC and increased CFTR and NKCC in medaka gills during SW were revealed by quantative PCR analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据