4.4 Article

Bone tissue engineering by using a combination of polymer/Bioglass composites with human adipose-derived stem cells

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 356, 期 1, 页码 97-107

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-013-1770-z

关键词

Bone tissue engineering; Adipose-derived stem cells; PDLLA/Bioglass (R) composite; Biodegradable polymers; In vivo

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Worldwide Universities Network (WUN)
  3. NIHR LMBRU
  4. Jilin Province Youth Foundation [20140520051JH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Translational research in bone tissue engineering is essential for bench to bedside patient benefit. However, the ideal combination of stem cells and biomaterial scaffolds for bone repair/regeneration is still unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the osteogenic capacity of a combination of poly(DL-lactic acid) (PDLLA) porous foams containing 5 wt% and 40 wt% of Bioglass particles with human adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Live/dead fluorescent markers, confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy showed that PDLLA/Bioglass porous scaffolds supported ADSC attachment, growth and osteogenic differentiation, as confirmed by enhanced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Higher Bioglass content of the PDLLA foams increased ALP activity compared with the PDLLA only group. Extracellular matrix deposition after 8 weeks in the in vitro cultures was evident by Alcian blue/Sirius red staining. In vivo bone formation was assessed by using scaffold/ADSC constructs in diffusion chambers transplanted intraperitoneally into nude mice and recovered after 8 weeks. Histological and immunohistochemical assays indicated significant new bone formation in the 40 wt% and 5 wt% Bioglass constructs compared with the PDLLA only group. Thus, the combination of a well-developed biodegradable bioactive porous PDLLA/Bioglass composite scaffold with a high-potential stem cell source (human ADSCs) could be a promising approach for bone regeneration in a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据