4.4 Review

The effects of lithium on cognition: an updated review

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 170, 期 3, 页码 225-234

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1592-x

关键词

lithium; memory; cognition; bipolar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Adverse cognitive effects associated with lithium are often implicated as contributing to vocational and social impairment, as well as medication noncompliance. As impaired cognitive functioning caused by lithium has clear clinical implications, it is important to determine whether evidence for or against impaired cognitive functioning exists in the literature. Objectives: An attempt is made to synthesize findings from previous studies, which assess a variety of cognitive domains, to determine whether conclusions can be drawn regarding lithium-associated cognitive impairment. The reversibility of neuropsychological impairment following lithium discontinuation and whether lithium administration has negative cumulative effects on cognition were also reviewed. Methods: Key word searches on Medline and Psych Info were completed for clinical articles that investigated the neuropsychological effects of lithium in clinical and normal populations between 1968 and 2000. Results: Despite methodological flaws, poor replicability and the subtle cognitive effects of lithium, five consistent findings emerged from the review; impairment on tasks of psychomotor speed, impaired functioning in the majority of studies examining verbal memory, no impairment on tasks of visuo-spatial constructional ability or attention/ concentration, and no negative cumulative effect. Conclusions: Many patients administered lithium carbonate complained of mental slowness. Lithium carbonate also appeared to have definite, yet subtle, negative effects on psychomotor speed. Studies reviewed also showed a trend toward impaired verbal memory. Recommendations with respect to future research, methodological and statistical problems, and additional clinical implications are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据